Wednesday 18 February 2009

Encouraging words on Sacred Music

by Peter Phillips (Tallis Scholars) from The Spectator.

People make assumptions about how other people think, and then influence the zeitgeist by broadcasting their findings.

People make assumptions about how other people think, and then influence the zeitgeist by broadcasting their findings. There is a circularity to this rule of thumb which is ultimately sterile, but which takes some deconstructing. One of the current such verities is that sacred music in worship is of no wide cultural relevance, either because it’s too clever and boring (polyphony), or too stupid and boring (folk masses); anyway it can be of no interest to anyone except fanatics.
This is not a thought about the secular achievements of groups like the Tallis Scholars, but of the gradual revival of good singing in the Catholic Church in recent years. Two events have shown the way: the music which accompanied Pope Benedict’s recent visit to Australia; and the remarkable, if largely unnoticed, push in France to found choir-schools (or maîtrises).

The music list for the Pope’s visit to Sydney was an eye-opener. Apparently the local clergy had proposed the usual dog’s dinner of ecumenically safe big-hearted tunes, sung by one community choir after another, until the Vatican intervened. When the Pope’s choice was known, one commentator (Noel Debien of St Francis, Paddington) wrote: ‘There were gasps of horrified surprise from 1970s Catholic liturgy-lovers (who prefer “Kumbayah, My Lord” and “Leaving On A Jet Plane”)’ as Victoria’s Missa Vidi speciosam and Palestrina’s motet Tu es Petrus (‘a look of bliss’ escaped the pontiff as it began) were sung liturgically. Also performed by papal command were the Gregorian Propers for the day, including ‘Introibo ad altar Dei’ as the procession reached the sanctuary. The motet at the procession of gifts (sung by a massed youth choir) was Mendelssohn’s ‘Sehet, welch eine Liebe’, sung in German, a fact which further inconvenienced the Seventies radicals. There are those who pray that Obama will not be shot; and there are those who pray that the Pope will not die of old age any time soon.

The improving choral scene in France is little trumpeted in Britain, possibly because it has taken a leaf out of our own book. The first of the modern foundations was masterminded by a Briton, Robert Weddle, in Caen in 1987. Edward Higginbottom helped with the establishment of a similar enterprise in Versailles a few years later. These set the scene for a series of initiatives which, spread about the country like Vatican II, couldn’t be undone fast enough. Not all of these resulted in new schools — some went no further than to channel existing resources towards the ideal of better choral singing in the liturgy; but in some cities serious sums of money, sometimes donated by France Télécom, have been found to kick-start a new tradition. In Nantes, for example, the cathedral maîtrise was opened in October 2007. Others, like the ones in Paris, Strasbourg, Dijon, Rennes and a host of other cities, speak in their blurbs of a life which pre-dates Napoleon, but in fact have recently overhauled themselves in the face of changing priorities.

The current French scene, which is evolving fast at the moment, originally had nothing to do with the Pope’s enthusiasms [Heaven forbid, though as we are talking France and not England, maybe the fact of a musical Pope with a Kappelmeister brother is not irrelevant.]but resulted from an instinctive and widespread sense that enough had been enough.

Not for the first time in the history of sacred music has a period of populism in worship been replaced by a renewed desire for sheer beauty, which in the Catholic Church has tended to mean a return to singing chant and Palestrina. However, unlike the last time this happened — in the early 19th century — the vastly superior standards of modern concert hall performances of this repertoire now set a benchmark which the cathedral choirs cannot ignore. The hope is that in time the French cathedral choirs, like our own, will not only be singing to fanatics.

The French go way back in Sacred Music - Notre Dame Polyphony- who could forget Leonin and Perotin?Machaut, who wrote the first extant polyphonic Mass setting .... so good for them. Does he mean musical fanatics, religious fanatics or just regular odd bods, I wonder?


gemoftheocean said...

Meant to comment on this one earlier. Intereresting what you say re people's perceptions of what other people want/think.

Nowhere in the Docs of Vatican II did I ever see "yes, people desire, want and need crappy and mediocre." But that's what we were "told."

I don't know if you've come across the book "Why Catholics can't sing" written by a man named Day. Perfect take. Day was remarking how one day he was rehearsing the organ in church, and he decided to play areally classical Church piece, difficult, "high art." Immediately, the somewhat older "uneducated" maintenance man toiling away suddenly dropped his mop and ran to the choir loft (he was an immigrant) and went into raptures looking at the words and singing along with enthusiasm. Being poor doesn't mean you have bad taste.

leutgeb said...

I didn't write all this. It's from a weekly mag calledThe Spectator. The author, Peter Phillips, is the Musical Director of The Tallis Scholars who are one of the finest English early music vocal ensembles.

He's spent his working life singing essentially Catholic Sacred Music whilst we have been going through a period of mainly ignoring it.

I agree. Everyone can be lifted up by beautiful art, architecture, vestments and music.

Why Catholics can't sing or why they don't want to sing rubbish for the sake of it?

THe Italians seem to have invented opera OK and the Germans have a pretty groovy choral tradition.